The only major testing done on Revolution is by Pfizer, the manufacturer. That is the vets only source of information on this product. Their own MSDS states it may cause liver damage. One of the ingredients is BHT, Butylated Hydroxytoluene, a chemical that used to be common in dog food until the pet owners raised such a public outcry that dog food manufacturers removed it from the ingredient list. So..it is not o.k. to put BHT in your dogs' food but it IS o.k. to put it in the bloodstream? Does that make sense to you?
The amount of BHT used in Revolution is listed as a trade secret. Having sold pharmaceuticals to veterinarians I know that sometimes 'trade secret' is used to hide things that might cause general public concern. Remember that the testing has only been done by Pfizer, not by a veterinary institution research university. If I had to guess, I would guess that BHT, an ingredient also found in embalmers fluid that will 'pickle' the liver,combined with Selamectin, a neurotoxin,could easily contribute to the problems her little dog is having. This chemical combination has to travel though the bloodstream to kill heartworm microfilaria, then it goes through the liver and kidneys where it is NOT filtered out because it has to enter the intestinal wall to kill parasitic worms and lastly it lodges under the skin to kill fleas and starts the cycle of reentering the bloodstream all over again. She may have greened her home but she has not greened her dog. Her veterinarian said it was safe. Does that sound safe to you?
Obviously the word safe is relative.
If my vet said that to me ,my question would be ,"who said it was safe".."what studies have been done?" "How much have you used it in your practice"? "Have there been any specific breed studies?" ( Pfizer did test it on Collies, but the dog in question is tiny and not a Collie) I am amazed at how few people question their veterinarian..even human doctors get questioned more. For example, your vet had ONLY 45 minutes of nutrition education in college. That is for all species, not just dogs. And I know people who feed Science Diet because the vet said it was the best.The sales rep may have convinced him that since he had little education on canine nutrition in school to rely on. I also know vets personally who have received kick back from Science Diet for the clients they put on the food. It wasn't about nutrition, it was about money. Kick back is huge in the medical world and that includes veterinarians so it is always in your dogs' best interest to question your vet. Of course they do their work because they love animals but they are busy and it is a lot easier to rely on a package insert and what the sales rep tells you than to take the time to do your own checking. We want to believe our vet is the best in the world but if we really want to do the best for our dogs we will ask questions..lots of them. I know veterinarians go crazy when clients read things on the internet but there are reliable sources such as Cornell online, UC Davis and UT Vet that provide much of the same information that your veterinarian should be accessing.
I say arm yourself with knowledge and ask questions to make the most informed decisions for your dog. You owe him that.
Why is that important you ask? Because for starters, knowing the health history and temperment of a breed is important in assessing how well a dog is a match for your family. If it didn't matter, then Petfinder and all the other rescue sites would advertise all mixed breeds as mutts...which is what they are.Only they don't. They advertise them as purebred mixes so that the potential adoptee has an idea of what kind of dog they are getting. If your needs or wants for a companion dog requires a quiet, tiny nonshedding breed then a German Shepherd mix isn't for you.
And while I am a big advocate for adoption, making disparaging remarks that damages responsible dog breeders is throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
Today I saw this note being shared thousands and thousands of times on Facebook and I was livid!
if responsible breeders stopped breeding there would be no healthy purebred dogs, only dogs with questionable backgrounds. Dogs whose parents never got their heart or eyes checked for hereditary problems, never had their hips certified clear so that their puppies don't have to suffer with hip issues. And never had proper veterinary prenatal care or puppy socialization.
People who truly love dogs understand that responsible breeders are the ones who research health problems and keep valuable data on health issues for other responsible breeders and scientific canine health researchers.
Beware of people out there who only want to be labeled 'rescuers' so that you can pat them on the back for their good deeds.
They care more about themselves than the dogs they rescue, and those are the kind of people who create these memes.
Propaganda like this makes them feel good about themselves but in the long run, it hurts all dogs, mixed and purebred.
Wise up, don't buy into the myth that dog breeders are bad.It was responsible dog breeders who created the breeds we know and love. And we need those responsible dog breeders now more than ever before to preserve the health and integrity of those breeds.
Puppymillers are lazy opportunists who exploit dogs.
Dog breeders didn't put those dogs on death row...Puppymillers and the irresponsible owners that buy from them did.
For Christmas, I wish uninformed people would come to the realization that puppymill owners are NOT dog breeders, and that by labeling them as such does harm to the many dedicated, responsible breeders who sacrifice their own time and money for the breed they love.